Posted: July 16th, 2007 at 9:13am
Many years ago, I was a member of a local Scout troop. On one occasion we were going to be camping in the woods, and as the mischievous teenagers we were, we decided it would be the perfect opportunity to bring plenty of booze. Our plot was simple: smuggle the contraband onto camp by concealing it in black soda bottles. Once we were set up in the woods and our leader had gone to sleep, we would drink and be merry. We had assumed that our leader would leave us alone and check on us during the night. We were wrong. The next day, whilst scrubbing the toilets, we reflected that perhaps we werenât as smart as we had thought…
OK, so that wasn’t a exactly textbook example of leadership. I could easily have opened up with a cliched tale of an ancient commander, leading his troops to victory in the face of overwhelming odds, but that only scratches the surface of leadership. More importantly, we all have the capacity to be great leaders without having to lead an army.
A very simplistic view of leadership is that it’s about getting people to work towards the same goal. However, the way this is done is what shows a leader’s true qualities. Bullying people into working will only get you so far, but being too easy going may not get you results at all. So what qualities do good leaders share?
When we think of leadership, we often assume it is reserved for certain people. After all, leaders are born, not made, right? The truth is, you have the potential to be a truly great leader, and it doesn’t have to involve leading hundreds of people. Setting an example to those around you is also a form of leadership. The goal doesn’t have to be completing a new project or building a skyscraper, but becoming a better person.
Posted: September 4th, 2006 at 10:01pm
When I started this blog back in June, I’d intended for it to become my main outlet for writing. I’d noticed a lot of my articles on my software development blog were leaning towards personal development, productivity and all kinds of self improvement topics.
I still wanted to write about games and software, but productivity and videogames are two very different audiences, so it was a good idea to split the blog into two. Originally I was going to pick some generic name for this blog, but I decided to use my own name which was very out of character. It seemed like it would be a good growth experience.
I’ve tried blogging with and without schedules, and I’ve found that using a schedule improves the quality and frequency of my work. Being able to see what articles will be published in the next few weeks allows me to prepare and research, and I find myself sometimes drafting posts weeks before they’re scheduled to be posted. It’s a nice feeling to know that you’ve taken care of a week’s worth of work.
I often feel that I can’t write about something unless I’m an expert on it, and I don’t really consider myself an expert at anything. Clearly, that has an effect on how much I write.
I didn’t really let my personality show through in any of my earlier work, and it made writing something of a chore. There can sometimes be a feeling that you should distance your personality from your blog, which probably comes from a need to protect the ego. People will criticise your blog no matter how good it is, so it’s only natural to try and separate it from yourself as much as possible.
Another point that’s related to not being an expert. I’d often write lengthy articles, and then bin them because they were full of perceived imperfections. Perfectionism is a huge barrier to personal productivity, and it’s even more problematic because it can be justified as “trying to maintain a level of quality”.
Looking ahead, I can see how my blogs are going to shape up over the next few weeks. This is a big help for scheduling work, and means I know a big article won’t sneak up on me. It could be argued that keeping a schedule removes some of the spontaneity and passion from a blog, but it suits my working style so I’m inclined to disagree.
Instead of trying to write from an expert’s point of view, I should write from my own point of view and discuss my experiences, the problems I’ve encountered and anything else that might help other people. If I’m struggling with something, the chances are that other people are struggling too.
Being criticised is part of life, and is definitely part of the internet. Letting my personality show is an important part of making the blog readable, and more importantly they make it more interesting to write for.
Dropping the perfectionist part of my personality is going to be difficult. I think this is something that will have to solved by experiencing life from a non-perfectionist point of view. For example, trying to live as a non-perfectionist for 30 days, and then seeing what happens.
So how did you find your blogging feet? What’s bugging you and what do you think is holding you back?