Review of "The Secret"

Posted: October 11th, 2006 at 2:28pm

I first read about “The Secret” on Erin Pavlina’s blog, and it wasn’t long before I saw it being mentioned on a few other blogs too. There were a lot of positive comments surrounding it, so I decided it was worth taking the time to watch it. It’s quite difficult to sum up the film, but at its simplest level it’s a documentary about how to achieve your goals and desires.

First Impressions

The first thing I noticed about the film is how well produced it is. I wasn’t really sure what to expect, but it’s polished nicely and visually interesting. The other thing that stands out is the passion of the speakers. It’s clear that they care a lot about the subject, and that it’s clearly benefited them over the years. Most importantly they all have a sense of humility and gratitude which can be quite humbling at times considering how successful they’ve been. The film is also quite humourous in places, and it’s clear that it’s meant to be uplifting and fun to watch.

A Brief Overview

The film itself covers a lot of ground, but is broken into chapters which makes it easier to keep up with things. The first part of the film is spent explaining what “the secret” is and how it can be applied, and the other chapters deal with ways of using it in specific areas of your life such as health, wealth and relationships.

The film details several exercises for applying “the secret”, and they’re all thoroughly explained and demonstrated through various real-life examples. One particular example that stands out is John Assaraf’s “vision board”, which is a powerful reminder as to how well out subconscious responds to mental imagery.

“The Secret” is taught from an “intention/manifestation” (also known as “law of attraction” or “cosmic ordering”) point of view. I’d been reading about this paradigm on several websites, and even though it seemed very “new agey”, I decided to approach the film with an open mind. In it’s simplest form, the intention manifestation model states that “thoughts become things”, and that by acknowledging this you can learn to use it for positive change.

An example given in the film is debt. If a person thinks about debt, even if they think how much they hate it, they will attract more debt into their lives. By utilising the law of attraction, they think about getting cheques in the mail instead of bills, and so they attract cheques instead of bills.

So What IS The Secret?

Deciding exactly what “the secret” is perhaps the most thought provoking thing about the film. It may be easy to brush off the theories as “hokey”, but if you look a little deeper you’ll find there are lessons to be learnt no matter what your point of view is.

Even though the film is based on the “law of attraction”, the exercises can be used by anyone. A good example of this is the creation of your goals. Defining what you want, visualising the result as already achieved, reinforcing it with positive emotions, and then continually revisiting the visualisation is the kind of activity that will bring results regardless of your particular belief system.

Final Thoughts

If you’re interested in personal development, it’s well worth a watch. It’s informative, yet also funny and genuinely touching in places. Regardless of your views on the “law of attraction” model, there is plenty of learn from the film.

You can watch the film for $4.95 at thesecret.tv, or order the DVD for $24.95.

Posted in: Positive Attitude,Success Strategies | Comments (27)

How to Create an Effective Schedule

Posted: October 4th, 2006 at 9:35am

Do Schedules Work?

Some time ago I looked at how David Allen’s “Getting Things Done” system was working for me, and pondered over some of the improvements that could be made. One of the improvements I thought about was the use of a schedule, so I’ve been experimenting with them over the past few weeks.

The overall results have been very positive, and although there’s still a lot of improvements that can be made, I’m confident that it’s worth the effort.

Why Bother With One?

Creating a Simple Schedule

Here are a few recommendations to help you when you’re creating your schedule:

You may need a few days to get into the groove of using a schedule, but the more often you do it the more proficient you will become.

Optional Extras

As you’ll notice from the rather colourful photo, I colour coded the tasks on my schedule. I tried two main methods of colour coding during the trial. 

The first method I tried was to colour code by category. This seemed like a logical idea at first, as I could see which projects were getting the most attention and which were being neglected. I soon realised that I would run out of colours if I used a different colour for each project! I modified the system slightly to use colours for more general categories, such as “computer projects”, “business projects” and “personal projects”.

After a few weeks of this system, I switched to colour coding by priority. I used the Covey Quadrant style categorisation for this method. If you’re not familiar with Covey’s four categories, they are:

  1. Urgent and Important Tasks — Firefighting, pressing problems and deadline driven tasks fit here.
  2. Important and Not Urgent — Tasks that need to be done, but aren’t particularly urgent. This is the area your should spend most of your time on.
  3. Not Important and Urgent — Things like some phone calls and meetings.
  4. Not Important and Not Urgent — You should look carefully to see if these activities are worth doing at all.

So far this method has worked the best, as it forces me to look at the bigger picture and to be more careful about where I spend my time. It might seem like a clash between the relatively priority free GTD system and the rigid quadrant based thinking, but really helps to keep a tight focus on what is important and what isn’t.

Future Improvements

Although using the quadrant method of sorting tasks worked well, I think there is room for improvement. I tent to think that most tasks are important or they wouldn’t be scheduled, so it’s pointless to classify everything as a quadrant two task. One method I’d like to try out is Steve Pavlina’s 50-30-20 rule (the Pavlina Pyramid?) for sorting tasks. These segments are:

  1. A Tasks — These are tasks that will yield significant benefits over a 5 year timespan (and beyond).
  2. B Tasks — Tasks that will bring benefits over the next 2 years or less.
  3. C Tasks –These will only bring improvements in the short term, and probably won’t be remembered further down the line. However, ignoring them could cause problems at a later date.

You’ll notice his system of prioritising is much more focused on long term goals and benefits, which can often be left behind in the rush to get something complete.

Posted in: Time Management | Comments (2)


« Newer Articles Complete Archives Older Articles »